The Google Killer

What will kill Google?  I surely don’t think they will dominate the Internet forever, and I think anyone who does is ignoring history.  There’s an interesting thread about this very topic over at Skrentablog, with some interesting comments as well.  Here’s my take.

Most importantly, I do not believe that KILLing Google will involve BEATing Google.  Things rarely shake out that way with established industries and products.  Usually it’s something NEW, and I think that will be the case here.  The thing that eventually ends up dethroning Google as the most important company on the Internet will not do what Google does, it will do something else.

Google’s foothold in search is insurmountable, sorry.  The one thing that you can’t ever compete against is their search history.  Anyone from the enterprise world knows that your data is your competitive advantage, the crown jewels.  Oh, they tease people by releasing little bits and pieces of it in products like Google Trends, and people get really excited because it lets us peek behind the curtain a little, but they make sure they cripple the data just enough so you could never do any serious analysis of it.

This data that Google has, it is almost certainly the most valuable data on earth.  Just think about what you would know with access to it:

  • Who is doing the searching (AOL kindly established that fact for us publicly)
  • Who works where (“Latigent benefits”)
  • What people who work where are looking for (“java developers”)
  • What people within specific verticals are searching for (“better widgets”)
  • What people who work at certain companies, or live in certain places, are interested in (“political corruption”)

And that’s just what I could come up with in 30 seconds.  Doing personality profiling is an extremely potent tool and, as I’ve written about before, can probably identify things about you that you yourself aren’t consciously aware of—just by grouping you with people who search for similar things to you, and extrapolating their data patterns out to you (sorry, snowflake, you’re not really all THAT different from everyone else, nor am I).  This all means that you will never beat them at their own game, they know too much about the market.  But I digress, we are talking about Google killers, after all :)

So, what do I think will kill Google?  That’s a good question.  I can offer my opinion, but really it’ll just take time to sort that out.  Not to dodge the question though, I believe it will be a decentralized interpersonal network sitting on top of the Internet with a two-way data flow between endpoints.  Something completely different, which you will use in an entirely different way from a search engine.  But if you’re looking search engines, I don’t think you’re going to beat Google.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • Reddit
  • http://yihongs-research.blogspot.com/ Yihong Ding

    Jason,

    It is glad to read your post. I read your name from your comments on Trent's post: Socializing Software. Also, I have read your previous posts about your understanding of the new structure about WWW. Many of your thoughts are very exciting. In fact, I am currently working on the study of web evolution. Though presented differently, some of our thoughts (yours, Trent's, and mine) are quite close to each other. If possible, I would like to have you being one of the proof readers when I finalize my theory.

    About this post, I totally agree with you that Google would not be so powerful as at present forever. My answer is straight: web is evolving. Google is a currently successful company because it produces products that matches the current stage of web evolution. But WWW does not stop at this stage. It continuously moves forward. If Google cannot catch (and very likely it may not) the trend, its importance is going to wane.

    I agree with you that Google's power lays on its data. But once upon a time, Yahoo had this power as the current Google; and it did not save Yahoo from its decline.

    What is the current data? They are raw materials if we need some analogy. It is like in our real world, we have crude ore. Certainly the one who own the mines of crude ore can make profit. But the difference is that Google does not really "own." The ultimate ownership still belongs to the public. And in our real world, refining manufacture is often more profitable than mining factories.

    Again, very nice to have shared with you. If you are interested in this topic and willing to have more discussion, I am always available on my email ([email protected]), or you can simply drop me a comment on my blog.

    I will continue reading and commenting on your blog. Your ideas are really great.

    cheers,

    Yihong

  • http://googlekillers.wordpress.com Damongligaw

    Jason and Yihong,

    I agree 100% to you guys that Google may not cope to ever-evolving web. In our present web era google serves the best of needs of the web users. The full credit to Google should be given for its unsurmountable feat in the search engine field. However, the web is changing everyday and all user demands cannot be address by Google alone. So, in the coming years I believe that more and more small venture company will come out ot open to show thier amazing stuffs. A great King cannot rule forever. A new one will emerge among numerous competitors and may hold throne of ruling the web in the near future.
    If you cannot beat a technology, then make it obsolete by creating different one.

    I have a blog that will monitor who will be the next compititor of Google that eventually may become — The Ultimate Google Killer.

    http://googlekillers.wordpress.com