Free Software Turns Me Off

I have a problem:  I love Web 2.0 startups and software as a service, and I have been using them.

On the face of it, that doesn't really sound like a problem, does it?

Only, in case you haven't been paying attention, these companies are dropping like flies.  The ones that haven't gone out of business are laying off workers like it's going out of style, which just proves how little foresight these companies had, or how bad their revenue models suck.  These companies obviously weren't paying enough attention to the macro-economic environment (not that it's an easy thing to do, it requires time and work to wrap your brain around it).  In the same vein, I should have been paying attention to the fact that they weren't paying attention, if I'm trusting them with my data.  My bad.

Now when I go to choose an online software provider, I'm struck by the stark reality that the company I choose may not be around a year from now.  That throws a wrench into the whole decision-making process, and starts making traditional software (a la Microsoft, believe it or not) more attractive to me.

Above all else–features, rounded corners, social networks–I do not want to lose my data.  My data is the result of my time, which is my most precious asset.  If I have the slightest doubt about the long-term viability of a company, if I can't grok their business model, I will not use them.

It's the reason I stopped using Disqus for my blog comments (and am now stuck with TypePad's utterly stupid and useless new comment system).  It's the reason I'm backing up my personal photos and videos to Amazon S3 and not solely entrusting them to sites like Flickr and YouTube.  It's my version of personal data responsibility.

Listen, startups:  if you want my business, you had better figure out your business model and make sure I can understand it.  As Mark Cuban recently pointed out regarding YouTube, desperation is not an attractive quality.  In fact, if you can expose your audited financial numbers to prove that you're actually making money, I'm much more likely to do business with you.

As weird as it sounds to say this, I am actually very turned off by free software right now.

Even better, let me back up my data somewhere (suggestion:  Amazon S3) in a usable format, so if you go out of business I'm not left high and dry.

I think this is going to be a huge psychological hurdle for Web startups in the coming months, much more important than people realize.  It is certainly going to kill the SaaS marketplace for the enterprise except for all but the biggest companies.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • Reddit
  • Wertigon

    I wouldn't be too worried, unless we're talking about using remote apps.

    A Free Software application has, if anything, *better* chance of surviving. Why? Because, the software is free, anyone is free to maintain it. Thus, if the company behind the product goes belly-up, the End User isn't stuck the way they would be in the (theoretical) situation of, say, Microsoft dying and orphaning Windows. While free software in and of itself isn't a guarantee to the survival of a software, it sure helps.

    Again, market forces at work here; if there is a market for it other people will continue the product. If not it'll remain in suspended sleep until someone forks it off or creates a clone. Just another day in the FLOSS ecosystem. :)

  • John Russell

    I am having this exact dilemma with evernote.com right now. It looks like a really cool tool, but note taking apps are only useful if you pour your whole life in, and I would hate for it to evaporate after all that effort. They have an export feature to XML while kinda helps.

    This is why I love Jungledisk.com which provides a really slick file system feature over amazone s3. Its amazon's storage, and you buy the app to access it. The basic file system access is open source so you know that unless amazon goes belly-up your data will be there forever. Very slick.

  • Lowery

    Well, the opposite of a remote app like the services you're trying to find is, of course, the distributed app which doesn't ever "die", but you have to host it (and it's data) elsewhere all by yourself.

    Wouldn't it be wonderful if there was some sort of "medium-rare" version of the same thing?

    http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/28/google-launches-google-apps-labs-third-party-developers-welcome/

    Google Apps is the closest thing I can think of at present, but it's not quite there.